7 Questions Every Literary Historian Should Be Able to Answer


Discover more from Fast Pop Lit

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

8 thoughts on “7 Questions Every Literary Historian Should Be Able to Answer

  1. THE CORRECT ANSWER for #1: Ayn Rand– if we’re talking influence outside the tiny box of literature, but on the world. On the direction of our civilization. Venture capitalists, mega-billionaires, self-obsessed ambitious egoists like Trump and Musk, a flood of tech hustlers who believe iimplicitly or explicitly in her ideology, on to a corporate-oriented no-business-restrictions Supreme Court, and one has to acknowledge we fully live in a Randian universe.

    -KW

    Like

  2. THE ANSWER for #3: Vladimir Nabokov’s cousin, Nicolas Nabokov, was Secretary General at the CIA-funded Congress for Cultural Freedom, founded in 1950 to steer culture and literature in a moderate, non-polemical direction. The Nabokovs were from a family of wealthy Russian nobility forced to flee the country during the Bolshevik Revolution. They were understandably hostile to all things on the left, including art smacking of populism. Nicolas worked first in the Cold War cause at Voice of America– where Vladimir also sought employment when he arrived in America, but was passed over.

    Like

  3. THE ANSWER for #4: At the end of World War II in 1945, pro-Fascist poet Ezra Pound was detained for three weeks in an outdoor steel cage at a U.S. military camp near Pisa, Italy.

    Like

  4. THE ANSWER for #5: Aben Kandel wrote the highly acclaimed novel, City for Conquest, in 1936. It was made into a melodramatic movie starring Jimmy Cagney. In the 1950s and 60s Kandel was screenwriter for “I Was a Teenage Werewolf,” and Joan Crawford’s final execrable film, “Trog.”

    Like

Leave a reply to collabnovel Cancel reply